Average Reviews:
(More customer reviews)I used the Mach 3 and the Quattro side by side, alternating days, for over 6 months. I had to replace the blade on the Mach 3 long before I replaced that on the Quattro. On this one trial, the Quattro lasted about 40% longer. This of course is likely to vary, might not be as good on other trials, and the judgement of when you have to change to a new blade is subjective, but the difference was so substantial that it seems beyond subjective, far outweighing the 5% or so added cost.
I had been happily using the Mach 3 before this. I see and feel no other significant difference in performance, feel, ease of cleaning and storing. Comments from other reviewers do not make any sense to me and do not jibe with what I see on other sites, e.g.
(...)
I even began to wonder if Gillette has got people to pack the reviews -- but of course that's silly, why would they ever do that.
If I were in Schick's marketing department, I'd pitch how long the blades last. Wasn't that the Wilkinson Sword pitch, years ago? Selling replacement blades is where the money is, and both companies want to focus our attention on quality of shave etc. Don't try to make those blades last! Go for the smooth, effortless experience of a new blade! But of course we all think about when we are going to have to buy a new pack of blades, and I'd say that market share is the more important factor for Schick. Maybe pitch the Quattro as lasting up to 40% longer than Schick's own 3-blade, and (independently) the 3-blade (which I have not tried) as equivalent to the Mach 3.
I now prefer the Quattro -- 6 to 4.
Click Here to see more reviews about: Schick Quattro Razor, 1 Razor
Quattro Razor the worlds first 4 blade razor
Get 75% OFF
Click here for more information about Schick Quattro Razor, 1 Razor
0 comments:
Post a Comment